DatasetSet_04_transDMproB_versus_LMproB.phenotype_transDMproB_versus_LMproB.cls
#transDMproB_versus_LMproB
Phenotypephenotype_transDMproB_versus_LMproB.cls#transDMproB_versus_LMproB
Upregulated in classtransDMproB
GeneSetINOH_SNON DEGRADATION SIGNALING
Enrichment Score (ES)0.7389072
Normalized Enrichment Score (NES)1.5095052
Nominal p-value0.017513135
FDR q-value0.4048913
FWER p-Value0.995
Table: GSEA Results Summary



Fig 1: Enrichment plot: INOH_SNON DEGRADATION SIGNALING   
Profile of the Running ES Score & Positions of GeneSet Members on the Rank Ordered List

PROBEDESCRIPTION
(from dataset)
GENE SYMBOLGENE_TITLERANK IN GENE LISTRANK METRIC SCORERUNNING ESCORE ENRICHMENT
1PSMB9230212772.0710.1011Yes
2PSMB105299 187614161.8330.1963Yes
3PSMB1231185081.7060.2869Yes
4PSMB696347751.4540.3541Yes
5SMAD2235118641.3760.4264Yes
6TLE423720 369711151.1870.4795Yes
7PSMB8500011321.1790.5446Yes
8TLE61966912331.1100.6014Yes
9PSMB5963316070.9150.6326Yes
10PSMA5646416540.8890.6799Yes
11PSMB31118019440.7240.7049Yes
12PSMA41117920220.6810.7389Yes
13PSMA2963129170.3340.7095No
14PSMB41525238660.1660.6679No
15PSMA39632 529840810.1440.6644No
16PSMB72795 1459844080.1170.6534No
17PSMA71431848640.0920.6341No
18TLE15765 10185 1585953750.0720.6107No
19PSMD210137 572465110.0430.5520No
20PSMA62127069760.0350.5290No
21TLE35767 1941670350.0340.5278No
22TLE2337812342-0.0300.2441No
23PSMA11627 1766912805-0.0370.2213No
24PSMB22324 1607816450-0.3890.0471No
25PSMC1963517755-1.2380.0463No
Table: GSEA details [plain text format]



Fig 2: INOH_SNON DEGRADATION SIGNALING   
Blue-Pink O' Gram in the Space of the Analyzed GeneSet



Fig 3: INOH_SNON DEGRADATION SIGNALING: Random ES distribution   
Gene set null distribution of ES for INOH_SNON DEGRADATION SIGNALING